The Special Libraries Association lists instructional design and development, teaching, and mentoring as enabling competencies needed by special librarians. With this in mind, let’s talk about learning.
Cognitive neuroscience and cognitive psychology have a lot to tell us about how people learn, and they also tell us what does not work for teaching and learning. One of the biggest myths in education is the idea that there are different learning styles. People are not visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learners. Research has debunked what used to be an undisputed part of every educational program.
However, researchers have developed the Universal Design for Learning framework that is based on scientific evidence. Similar to the idea of learning styles, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), provides guidance for how to meet the needs of different individuals in various learning environments. More specifically, “Universal design for learning (UDL) is a framework to improve and optimize teaching and learning for all people based on scientific insights into how humans learn” (CAST, 2019, para. 1).
The UDL guidelines focus on three neural networks:
- Affective networks: the “why” of learning
- Recognition networks: the “what” of learning
- Strategic networks: the “how” of learning
The creators of UDL have identified ways to promote learning in each of these networks. Broadly, to promote learning provide different ways for individuals to learn through various ways to engage with the content, multiple ways for individuals to consume content, and various ways for individuals to express their learning. The ways of learning are aligned with the neural networks as follows:
Affective networks: the “why” of learning= Provide multiple means of engagement
Recognition networks: the “what” of learning= Provide multiple means of representation
Strategic networks: the “how” of learning= Provide multiple means of action and expression
UDL for Special Libraries
As we seek to create training opportunities for our stakeholders, using the UDL guidelines will help us develop content that is inclusive. Developing training content is challenging in any setting, but when working with adults who have a lot of experience learning in various settings, creating meaningful learning opportunities can be even more difficult. Instead of teaching the way we were taught, UDL offers guidance for how to create more meaningful learning for all our stakeholders.
My next three posts will dive into applying UDL guidelines in special libraries and include many practical examples. Stay tuned!
May, C. (2018). The problem with “learning styles.” Scientific American. Retrieved from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-problem-with-learning-styles/
Nancekivell, S. (2019). Belief in learning styles myth may be detrimental. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2019/05/learning-styles-myth
Toppo, G. (2019). Neuromyth of helpful model? InsideHigherEd. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/01/09/learning-styles-debate-its-instructors-vs-psychologists
CAST. (2019). About Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html#.XfLQdmRKhPY
Special Libraries Association. (2016). Competencies for information professionals. Retrieved from https://www.sla.org/about-sla/competencies/
Lauren Hays, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology at the University of Central Missouri. Please learn more about Lauren and read her other posts about skills for special librarians; then take a look at Lucidea’s powerful ILS, SydneyEnterprise, used daily by innovative special librarians.
Skills for special librarians include mentoring and knowing how to reap the benefits of being mentored. Tips for how to build mentoring skills
Special librarians are uniquely equipped to research resources for lifelong learning and personal enrichment
Successful special library assessment includes developing useful assessment questions and deciding which methods are best to answer them
Successful library assessment depends on a ‘culture of assessment’ and involves the entire library staff with the goal to improve customer service.