The concept of communities of practice came from work on a social theory of learning conducted by Lave and Wenger (1991). The idea of communities of practice is that through engagement in social learning settings, members create meaning, engage in practice, build community, and form identities.
When I wrote my dissertation, the study was underpinned by the theory of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998). While my area of study was librarians’ teacher identity development, the community of practice theory has implications for all librarians as they seek to grow in their careers. The theory also has implications for supervisors and hiring managers who need ideas for how to help new hires become part of the team.
Let’s examine the theory a bit more and then, think about how it can be applied.
To understand the conceptual framework of the Communities of Practice social learning theory, one must start with four premises:
- We are social beings. Far from being trivially true, this fact is a central aspect of learning.
- Knowledge is a matter of competence with respect to valued enterprises—such as singing in tune, discovering scientific facts, fixing machines, writing poetry, or being convivial.
- Knowing is a matter of participating in the pursuit of such enterprises, that is, of active engagement in the world.
- Meaning—our ability to experience the world and our engagement with it as meaningful—is ultimately what learning is to produce. (Wenger, 1998, p. 4)
These premises help to make sense of how we should use this theory in our work. Specifically,
- We learn through social interactions.
- It is important to have knowledge of a topic the group deems valuable.
- In order to participate, a person must have certain knowledge.
- Learning produces meaning.
In sum, opportunities for gaining knowledge should be provided. It is important to create opportunities for new hires, your team, or yourself, to engage in conversation and collaborative work in order to grow and learn. Learning helps us make meaning of what we do in our jobs.
While this post only touches the surface of communities of practice, I hope it sparks ideas and encourages you to dig into the theory in more depth. When we understand how humans learn, we can create better opportunities and better places of work.
*Some of these ideas and sentences are taken directly from my dissertation. The full dissertation can be found here.
References and Recommended Resources
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., & Wenger-Traynor, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/
Lauren Hays, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology at the University of Central Missouri, and a frequent speaker on topics related to libraries and librarianship. Her professional interests include information literacy, educational technology, library and information science education, teacher identity, and academic development. Please read Lauren’s other posts about skills for special librarians. And take a look at Lucidea’s powerful integrated library systems, SydneyEnterprise, and GeniePlus, used daily by innovative special librarians in libraries of all types, sizes and budgets
Librarians need to gather assessment data to see how well libraries are meeting needs, how the collection is being used, and knowledge/service gaps.
The Technology Integration Matrix helps instructors be purposeful in their integration of technology in instructional settings, such as in libraries.
Interview with authors of Managing Data for Patron Privacy, which examines how librarians can improve the privacy of patron data.
This book addresses the problem of overwork and helps us think through ways to re-center our lives so that work does not creep into every corner.