In this miniseries we’ve reviewed the different ways front-end portals for Museum Collection Management Systems (CMS) are offered and the costs involved when working with a front-end that’s separate from the CMS or offered as an “add on” to the back-end. This post concludes the miniseries with a review of benefits that come with a fully integrated front-end portal, and outlines the circumstances where an integrated front and back-end make sense.
This post is of particular use to museum staff who need supporting arguments to convince their boss to invest in a fully integrated CMS front and back-end.
What’s the Difference Between an Optional Back-end and an Integrated Back-end?
First, here’s a quick review of the main difference between an optional or “add on” CMS front-end and an integrated front-end.
An optional front-end portal is one that wasn’t built as a part of the CMS as a whole. The front-end is considered an optional feature and one that can be added onto the existing CMS product—a product that by default is just the back-end.
A fully integrated fronted portal is one that was built as a part of the museum CMS and is considered one whole unit versus an optional feature. The front-end portal functionality is completely integrated, equally invested in, and will grow as a part of the CMS product.
The Benefits of a Fully Integrated Portal
The benefits of choosing a fully integrated museum CMS are multiple. Not only does the integration help save direct and indirect costs, it also limits data issues, and cuts down on trouble-shooting and maintenance work. Here’s a full list of those benefits spelled out:
- An integrated front and back-end saves staff time and money during implementation, use, and maintenance.
- Integration eliminates “lost in translation” issues with data from one system to another.
- Time spent trouble-shooting and custom code needs is decreased significantly.
- Presentation of a portal that meets Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) will be more easily achievable.
- The integrated portal will have to-the-minute updated information provided without having to refresh or re-index the front-end.
- An integrated portal will be more responsive to current needs—needing to work only with one system for the design and information flow.
A fully integrated portal is usually the best choice in any museum situation, and particularly so if the following conditions are present:
- The museum is short on staff time and expertise.
- The museum is short on cash for implementing two platforms, creating custom code, and providing ongoing maintenance.
- Museum staff are stretched thin and need one seamless system for sustainable workloads.
- The museum staff want to meet user expectations by offering a visually dynamic and robust front-end portal.
- Museum staff want to invest equally into their museum front-end as well as back-end because they understand that both sides of the CMS are equally important.
When it comes to the front-end portal for a museum CMS the best bet is to purchase a CMS platform that fully integrates the front and back-end. This choice will help you save staff time and money, will reduce the issues and workarounds needed for the portal to operate optimally, and will deliver a more engaging user experience to your visitors.
If your museum is embarking on a the search for a new museum CMS then please check out the following posts on Lucidea’s Think Clearly Blog: 3 Things to Look for When Choosing a Museum Collections Management System, How to Begin Your Search for the Right Museum CMS, How to Form a Museum CMS Procurement Team, How to Test, Vet, and Purchase a New Museum CMS, and How to Identify Specifications for a New CMS. And don’t forget to grab your free e-copy of my book: How to Select, Buy, and Use a Museum CMS.
Rachael Cristine Woody
Expert Rachael Cristine Woody advises on museum strategies, collections management, and grant writing for a wide variety of clients. Register here for the next webinar in Rachael’s series on Collections Management System Essentials for Impact on 11/25/20, where she’ll expand on the benefits of museum CMS front-end/back-end integration. Learn about Lucidea’s Argus solution for integrated museum collections management.
Assess digital collections and reallocate resources (time and CMS money) to ensure you’re delivering the best possible virtual collection experience
Library, archives, and museum staff know their work is essential, but fail to consistently translate this value; expert advice on getting through.
A museum’s digital presence is just as important as its physical presence; we need to start using our CMS data when we speak about collection value.
Mining museum CMS data helps you become more efficient and impactful, quantifying the value of activities to see what is and isn’t working