I imagine cataloging efforts in the 19th and early 20th century to be akin to the Wild West. The people of the West may have had good intentions and some basic principles in place, but each town governed themselves differently, and the few rules in place were loosely adhered to.
Out of the three fields Libraries, Archives, and Museums (LAM), museums were the last to create and adopt robust rules for cataloging items. Though there are guidelines and suggestions for how a museum should catalog, much is still left up to the museum to determine.
With limited guidelines in place it can be tempting to try and populate every possible field (with hundreds of field options) or, on the other end of the spectrum, to catalog the minimum amount of information.
Benefits of Sustainable Museum Cataloging
Establishing a sustainable museum cataloging practice will have multiple benefits:
- Consistent data (in quality & quantity) across all museum object records
- Museum staff confident in their cataloging
- Less staff time spent on unnecessary cataloging
- Decrease in occurrences of cataloging burnout among staff
- More items cataloged
- Lesser percentage chance of error (incorrect field and/or incorrect information)
- Higher percentage chance of compatibility with inter-operable search engines
- Limited scope when data clean-up is required
- Succession of cataloging practices not at-risk during staff turnover
Steps in Ensuring a Sustainable Museum Cataloging
A sustainable museum cataloging practice includes a clearly determined scope, clear documentation, consistency, and commitment to not deviate from the practice.
In order to determine a sustainable scope for museum cataloging, it may be worth quickly reminding ourselves of the catalog’s original purpose, how the museum needs the catalog to work, and how the museum audience wants the catalog to work. For a brief review of catalog history, we can look at the still commonly used definition of the word catalog, defined by Google Dictionary as:
- 1. a complete list of items, typically one in alphabetical or other systematic order, in particular.
Catalogs were and are, first and foremost, a list of items. According to Steven Lubar, professor of American Studies at Brown University and author of Inside the Lost Museum: Curating, Past and Present, the modern museum catalog’s origin is directly tied to the emergence of public museums. Lubar quotes Fritz Keers when describing The Louvre’s first public catalog (dated 1793): “the essential features: a printed list of objects in the collection, in systematic order—in this case, the same order as their hanging—and including descriptions which facilitate identification of the objects by the public.”
While the concept of a museum catalog is centuries old, it’s important to note how the catalog has evolved, with the largest recent change being the adoption of electronic Collections Management Systems (CMS).
In the last 40 years, museum catalog systems and rules have evolved. Unlike libraries and archives—where there are only a few endorsed standards, classifications, and authorities to choose from—the museum field has several options and tends to be less regulated. Often, decisions are predicated on the type of collections held at the museum, as opposed to universal rules adopted by the field.
Create Rules + Documentation
For the catalog to meet the needs of the museum and the wants of the museum audience, it’s important to choose and implement cataloging rules and guidelines that fit both. A review of available options should be conducted by museum staff. Additionally, staff should review the collections management system to determine what standards, classifications, and authorities are already built-in.
Afterwards, the following steps should be taken to develop sustainable and easy-to-follow catalog instructions:
- Identify cataloging fields with indications of “required” and “recommended”.
- Indicate standards, classifications, thesauri, and authorities the museum follows when cataloging.
- Articulate guidelines for how data should be entered into each field, including standardized language, avoidance of abbreviations and acronyms, and appropriate writing style.
With vision, forethought, and consistency a sustainable museum cataloging practice is possible.
To read more on the fascinating history of the museum catalog, please see Steven Lubar’s 4-part blog series; the first installment titled “A brief history of American museum catalogs to 1860.”
It’s a myth that digitizing museum collections is too expensive, slow, or hard from a technical perspective. Provides context and ideas.
Museum collection digitization is not cheap, not fast, not technically easy. Museum professionals should educate stakeholders about this myth.
There are five museum digitization myths, and it’s time to dispel them. The first myth is that we can or should digitize the entire museum collection
The budget is key to a grant application; it’s the last check to ensure everything is correct and your budget request aligns with the project scope.