A Firm Foundation for Faceted Search
Phil Green
Let me illustrate the benefits of facets applied to well organized, well cataloged content, using a collection of books as an example. Facets based on the Author field aren’t normally very useful. Author is most often a unique field. Therefore, the Author facet is simply a list of all the Authors, which is not very helpful for refining your search results. On the other hand, if the books are well cataloged, and have been classified by Type as well as Subject(s), using a controlled vocabulary, the Type facet will show you a smaller list of Types of books (e.g. Biography, Travel, Fiction-Mystery, etc.) and the Subject facet will show you a smaller list of key subjects (Medical Research, Medieval England, Metallurgy, etc.). These shorter lists help users efficiently navigate search results so that they can find the book they seek, such as a travel guide to medieval English sites.
Faceted search definitely offers many benefits. For example, one of the great things about facets/fields is that they are domain specific, so librarians and subject specialists can build specific taxonomies for each domain – and offer very powerful access routes to content. By the way, Amazon is a great example of faceted search capabilities because their content is structured and organized (e.g. External hard drive; USB interface; 1.5 Gigabytes), whereas Google doesn’t do faceted searching as they don’t use fields and must rely on full text searching – which can make it harder to quickly find specific content.
You might be wondering how best to develop the controlled vocabularies (e.g. “taxonomies”) for each field. This can be done in several ways:
- The old fashioned way – speak to users, gather information from domain experts, and build a list of terms commonly used for the field you want to facet
- User behavior based – gather search statistics, review social tags, etc. and build the controlled vocabulary based on this input
- Use a combination of the above.
Of course, the next question is “How can you apply the newly developed controlled vocabulary to the collection?” That is definitely an important issue, and again, it is often a combination of manual work and effective automation. We’ll tackle that topic in a future post, so please stay tuned.
Similar Posts
The LEXICON Framework Part 4: Integrate with Existing Systems
Stan Garfield explores practical ways to embed KM tools into the platforms your team already uses reduces friction, boosts adoption, and makes organizational knowledge easier to access.
The LEXICON Framework Part 3: 10 Ways to eXplain the Value of Knowledge Management
KM expert Stan Garfield offers 10 practical ways to explain and prove the value of knowledge management using Clare Bilobrk’s LEXICON framework.
The LEXICON Framework Part 2: Empower Champions of KM
In part two of our LEXICON series, we explore how empowering KM champions can strengthen knowledge management adoption. Discover practical strategies to identify champions, define their roles, and connect them across your organization.
The LEXICON Framework Part 1: Link KM to Daily Workflows
Stan Garfield explores the LEXICON framework for KM, sharing 16 strategies to embed knowledge management into daily workflows effectively.



