Faceted Searching is Just Better!
Lucidea
Faceted searching is becoming a standard for special libraries that want to help end users find relevant content quickly and easily. Not all library automation systems today offer faceted searching. If they do, it’s definitely a competitive advantage.
What is faceted searching?
Faceted searching, browsing or navigation is an efficient way to quickly access a library’s collection, internal or external databases or other information repositories. It renders faceted (e.g. categorized) results classification, allowing users to discover content by filtering. A good faceted searching system associates an item with many different taxonomic terms, rather than into a single determined order.
Faceted searching is to end users what Boolean search is to a librarian. Users love faceted searching because it gets them the benefits of Boolean/fielded searching -increased precision and small numbers of high quality results -without AND/OR/NOT drop downs or multiple search box interfaces.
Faceted searching doesn’t work on full text data, which is why Google doesn’t offer it. A well-structured database and fields that are well curated are essential – that is why good faceted searching requires a good librarian in the background!
Can you see the value?
Each user who conducts a faceted search can get a quick overview of results by category, and then continue refining their search until they get the best content. Users can see how many results are in each category, making it obvious which to look at first. They can decide on their own search strategy and change their search result filters at any time.
When you are considering investing in a new library automation system, you need to carefully consider how well the system searches and whether its search capabilities are end user focused. Faceted searching is a clear winner!
Similar Posts
3 Major Drawbacks of Using GenAI for Research
Researchers must take responsibility for understanding how GenAI works and closely review literature search results before relying on them. Let’s take a look at three major drawbacks for researchers and special librarians to consider when leveraging or recommending GenAI platforms.
Researching with GenAI: Tools & Tips for Special Librarians
When GenAI first became widely available, there was a great deal of discussion about how it would “hallucinate”—that is, make up content and sound very sure of itself when doing so.
Interview with the Author: Anna Neatrour on The High Impact Digital Library
Many different types of libraries have digital components, and it is important to get those digital collections in front of stakeholders.
Interview with the Editors: Wieland and Rogers on Interdisciplinary Archival Science
Alexandra Wieland and Corinne Rogers co-edited Archival Science in Interdisciplinary Theory and Practice. My interview with them is below.