Midsized law firms face unique challenges when it comes to knowledge management. Just as large multinational firms must, they need to provide a solid knowledge management foundation, to protect and leverage the firm’s knowledge assets, and utilize the best technology for the firm’s KM requirements—but unlike their larger brethren, midsized firms are often resource constrained. What does KM success look like for these firms, and how can you get there too?
Lucidea engages in ongoing discussions with clients and potential clients, where we review the current state of law firm knowledge management. This helps us build an overview of challenges and opportunities, and most importantly, develop real world examples of what success looks like when you have a solid KM strategy combined with powerful technology, whether you buy or build.
Law firm KM challenges and opportunities include:
- Exponential growth of mobile device programs
- Scattered information architecture
- Lack of taxonomies or metadata
- Integration with existing firm systems and applications
- Business productivity versus data governance
You must be able to answer questions such as:
- What exactly are my knowledge assets?
- Who should and does have access to them?
- How do I get the complete picture?
- How do I make decisions on what technology to apply?
So, what does success look like? You can watch our webinar to learn how our LawPort clients achieve it—without the need for third party consultants, expensive connectors or a multi-year, 2-3—person implementation done by your IT department. Key indicators of success include:
- Your portal is the primary source for information storage and access
- Advocacy and contributions from executive management are a given
- The portal is actively, continually populated and managed
If your museum has a CMS but not a DAMS (and no budget for a DAMS) there are a few ways you can creatively construct a “for now” DAMS solution.
As special librarians who provide training, it is our job to use reputable sources and research-based practices rather than perpetuating neuromyths.
Archival digital records have 3 levels of usability that build on each other; as an organization matures archivists can aim to achieve higher levels.
Virtual teams, including those focused on knowledge exchange, are widespread. There are many effective virtual channels for knowledge sharing.